Loading NUVC...
Please wait a moment...
Please wait a moment...
How it works
Any deck can tell a good story — and now any founder can generate a polished one in minutes. NUVC scores against verified evidence, not the claims on the slide. Here's how a NuScore is built, and why you can trust the number.
The short answer
No. The deck is the input, not the verdict. A NuScore fuses three independent signals — a deterministic rule engine, machine-learning features, and an AI scoring judge — and then cross-checks the claims against public data. A single language model never decides your score on its own. That's the difference between a tool that summarises what you wrote and one that evaluates whether it holds up.
Why you can trust it
Three things separate a NuScore from a confident guess: it verifies claims, it weights verified facts above stated ones, and it's calibrated against companies whose outcomes are already known.
Pillar 1 — Verification
An integrity layer runs on every deck: AI-generated-content detection, financial-consistency checks, and cross-signal contradiction analysis. If the traction slide and the financials disagree, the score knows.
Pillar 2 — Provenance
A fact confirmed against public sources counts for more than the same fact asserted on a slide. Enrichment runs against public data, and anything that can't be corroborated is marked unverified — never asserted as true.
Pillar 3 — Calibration
The score is calibrated against 1,400+ real funding decisions — including 85 known-outcome companies from SpaceX to Theranos. Every score ships with a confidence level. Sparse data means low confidence, and we say so.
The pipeline
When you upload a deck, you trigger a workforce — eight named agents run in parallel and return a result in about 60 seconds, across 7 venture dimensions.
Extract the deck
Parse the PDF into structured signals — team, market, traction, financials, the ask.
Score with three independent signals
An AI judge, a deterministic rule engine, and machine-learning features each weigh in. Fusion reconciles them — no single model decides.
Check the claims
Integrity flags contradictions and AI-generated content; enrichment verifies team and traction against public sources, asynchronously.
Explain and calibrate
Return a 0–10 score with a confidence level and a waterfall showing which dimension moved the number.
Want the underlying science — datasets, papers, and the fund-scoring benchmark? Read the research →
The dimensions
Seven venture dimensions, each scored 0–10 with reasoning, combined into one fundability score:
Responsible AI
NUVC deliberately does not collect founder gender, ethnicity, age, or educational prestige — the model cannot discriminate on data it does not hold. A first-time founder in regional Australia is scored on the same merits as a repeat founder in San Francisco. Every score is explainable, every founder can appeal and request human review, and a governance layer monitors outcomes for anomalous score clustering and recalibrates when patterns disadvantage any cohort.
Upload your pitch deck and get VC-grade analysis in 60 seconds — free.